Posted on August 18, 2014, in Daily Post and tagged 50 Shades of Grey, glorifying abusive relationships, How It Should Have Ended, kink, Lucky Number Thirteen, nsfw, The Pervocracy. Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.
- Welcome to Leo Tarvi's adventures in blogging! Please see the About page for more information.
Search Leo’s adventures
-
-
Tanishq Abhi GuptaThat "cartoon" showed the harsh reality!
-
Lora myersThe first one is a bind rune of protection, but reversed, so maybe danger. The second is protection.
-
A Runic Mystery | The Adventures of Leo Tarvi[…] a frustrating bug that broad symbolic interpretation is really wide open. I think I mentio
-
C. S. HammondThank you for posting! :) www.cchomeschooler.com/blog
-
nallathis was fun to read, leo! i'm glad it caught your imagination and poked you in just the right way.
-
Leo TarviSince I first posted this I've been told that the Obama connection is there, but not what it seems t
-
AV女優エロ動画Appreciate it for helping out, good info.
-
a lie built right into the name | The Adventures of Leo Tarvi[…] complained before about obfuscation in election issues, and I’m sure I will again. I
- September 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (1)
- December 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (7)
- July 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (2)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (1)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (5)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (6)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (9)
- November 2012 (18)
- October 2012 (21)
- September 2012 (15)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (29)
- May 2012 (31)
- April 2012 (18)
- March 2012 (30)
- February 2012 (31)
- January 2012 (32)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (32)
- October 2011 (34)
- September 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (6)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (4)
Aliaa Magda Elmahdy assholes blah book review bullies can't think of a fun tag for this one censorship Did empathy go out of style? education equality evolution ex-gay fairytale fiction fuck fucking patriarchy gay marriage history holy crap that got long human fucking beings human rights I suck at this mystery NaNoWriMo nonfiction Politics postaday2011 postaday2012 pretentious philosophizing (redundant?) R.C. Murphy random rants religion science science fiction search terms sex sick sick with rage spaceship Earth stereotypes total copout Twitter weirdness writing- Daily Post (400)
- Fiction (4)
- Nonfiction (15)
- Personal (33)
- Politics (4)
- Requests (3)
- Reviews (2)
- Subscribe Sunday (2)
- U.S. Constitution (5)
- Uncategorized (8)
-
Twitter Updates
Tweets by LeoTarvi- Join 132 other subscribers
Copyright note
Unless otherwise noted, all original works and posts on this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
The answer is really sad: our media and our parents teach girls to value hopeless romantics (stalkers), men who will never let them go (stalkers/abusers), passionate men (angry abusers), and bullheaded men (self-centered assholes). We also teach girls that men are always right, that women apologize and forgive, that women can change their man for the better, and that women always *always* give men the benefit of the doubt. Then we refuse to teach girls what consent is, teach all children that physical boundaries that they want to set don’t matter, and blame women for crimes committed against us– in the view of girls who may have similar things happen to them in the future. For girls who don’t have parents with a functional relationship or who have a parent that fits one of those “romantic ideals,” the media reinforces that these are men to be desired. Girls in that situation have no basis for knowing to avoid those men; boys in that situation strive to become them when they grow up.
If girls follow that training, we may never realize that what’s happening to us is wrong. Or if we’re lucky, we may reach a breaking point and run like hell. If we’re super lucky, we may eventually become able to detect those tendencies in men and prefer men who don’t display them.
The only thing that I needed to know about 50 Shades of Grey is that the plot features a “BDSM contract,” something that upstanding people in the BDSM community know violates consent. IRL, these contracts are typically used to gaslight kidnapped or confined sex slaves so that they believe that they do not have a legal right to escape. Contracts are super blech.
Thank you for that detailed and depressing comment.
The contract part interests me more than it depresses me, so I’ll talk about that.
I hadn’t really thought about it before, but a contract is an adversarial thing to begin with, isn’t it. It makes sense in a lot of friendly contexts, just in case things stop being so friendly, but I can see how it could be used this way. I do think there’s something to writing out boundaries and other such details, but then that’s why we have things like the Want! Will…Won’t. charts.
Those look like negotiation worksheets, which I’ve done (although typically through the guide in SM 101, IIRC) and which are very different from a “slave contract.” Slave contracts were one of the first items that made people want internet censorship and the defense was that they were just for fantasy, not intended to be used. Here’s an example (not explicit, read to the end to see the problem): http://www.milism.net/cache/336816/slave336816contract.htm The person who wrote it says that it’s legally binding, which is not true if it coerced or if it is signed in a state where it is impossible to sign away a right (like CA).
The following is not the only case, but it is the most notorious case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_Colleen_Stan I’ve seen interviews with Stan where she discussed the contract, the coercion to get her to sign it, and her conviction that it was, as her captors told her, legally binding. IIRC, her kidnapper got the contract on a BBS. There are also groups on Second Life who do this kind of play, which sometimes spills into real life. I know people who have met their SL owner for a play weekend and come out ok, but even they have told me stories of previous slaves meeting with the same master, in which the slave ran away and never spoke to him again. That sounds like boundary crossing and assault, but she can’t report that. Who would believe her, a woman who flew into town to be a sex slave for a weekend, especially one who signed a contract indicating permanent consent without limits? Contracts coerce victims of crimes to not report those crimes at any point in the future.
So the idea of a book including a woman signing a slave contract, and having that treated as porn? That’s cause for an extremely long, completely non-sexy shower.
Well, she never actually signs the contract, or at least hasn’t two chapters from the end of the book. But that’s okay, Asshole McRapist has made it clear that he ignores the rules whenever he feels like it anyway. Because he’s such a domly manly dom man.
Ew.
Something that really isn’t taught as well or as completely as it should be is legal concepts like what makes a binding contract and what rights people have. The whole reason “I know my rights” is such a cliche is that most people don’t.
This web site really has all of the info I needed about this subject and didn’t
know who to ask.